Marketing is about the most features for the price, not SQ. In more recent times, receivers are mainly used in HT, and are mostly bought in box stores or online. the makers actually competed to out SQ each other at a given price point. A fair number of buyers actually bought them based on which one they perceived as having better SQ. In the 70's many receivers were bought at audio stores and auditioned. With these older receivers, even the 200 gram LP's put out by Classic Records almost sound as good as the original LP's. The older units do sound better and they obviously were built better as they are still going strong.īoth of the Sansui receivers sound much better than the Pioneer, but the Pioneer has a better CD-4 demodulator and that's why I upped to it. And yes, I have a full quadraphonic set-up. All 3 of these are quadraphonic and over 30 years old. Currently my music system uses a Pioneer QX-949. For listening to music, I have used a Sansui QRX-6001 and a Sansui QRX-7500. My current Sony is used for my home theater system. A friend of mine has gone through several Yamahas and a Denon receiver, al late model equipment. One thing I noticed was that with each progressively newer model the features increased and the sound quality got worse. Over the last 10 or so years, I have fried at least 3 Sony AV receivers. Yes, the older receivers were of much higher quality and better sounding.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |